
With over 20 years of bricklaying experience, the JRC team has built a strong reputation for cost effective and professional bricklaying solutions. We are fully licensed and insured, and our Melbourne bricklayers deliver specialist bricklaying and blocklaying services throughout the South Eastern Suburbs of Melbourne.
JRC have a demonstrated ability to run multiple projects and always supply enough labour to meet and exceed programme deadlines.

From Wantirna to Werribee we cover the Greater Melbourne area and continue to travel to do what we love. No job is too small or too big. We'll be there on time and with a professional approach to any job.

We offer an extensive list of services to suit all requirements.
At JRC our team of highly skilled and experienced tradesmen are capable with all aspects of Brickwork construction. We have the skills and processes in place to meet your exact requirements. We have a proven track record in the delivery of technically challenging projects. You will find our team easily accessible and willing to give advice through to the completion of your project.
At JRC we have laid hundreds of thousands of square metres of perfect blockwork.
We have an experienced and fully trained workforce committed to providing quality workmanship whilst exceeding client expectations, delivered on time and on budget, within a safe environment.
JRC know what is expected of us and more importantly, our clients know what to expect from us, a consistent and professionally delivered service with a name built on honesty and quality.
Noise reduction (NR), dB, provided by adding acoustical absorbents in a space can be determined from A A NR 10 log o a (11.14) 10 Ao where Ao original acoustical absorption present Aa added acoustical absorption Acoustical absorption equals the sum of the products of each area (in consistent units) in the space times the absorption coefficient of the material constituting the surface of the area; for example, the floor area, ft2 its absorption coefficient, plus ceiling area, ft2 its absorption coefficient, plus total wall area, ft2 its absorption coefficient. [Note: An anomalous but useful term is often used in advertising data, the noise reduction coefficient (NRC). This is the arithmetic average of the sound absorption coefficients of a material as determined at 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz (Art. 11.79.5). Since these frequencies include the most significant speech and intelligibility ranges, such a figure is a reasonably good means of comparing similar materials; that is, materials with absorption characteristics not differing widely from one another within this frequency range. Often, NRC is used, instead of the absorption coefficients at various frequencies, to determine an average noise reduction
end moments become negligible. To reduce the number of cycles, the unlocking of joints should start with those having the greatest unbalanced moments. Suppose the end moments are to be found for the prismatic continuous beam ABCD in Fig. 5.75. The I /L values for all spans are equal; therefore, the relative fixed-end stiffness for all members is unity. However, since A is a hinged end, the computation can be shortened by using the actual relative stiffness, which is 3/4. Relative stiffnesses for all members are shown in the circle on each member. The distribution factors are shown in boxes at each joint. The computation starts with determination of fixed-end moments for each member (Art. 5.11.4). These are assumed to have been found and are given on the first line in Fig. 5.75. The greatest unbalanced moment is found from inspection to be at hinged end A; so this joint is unlocked first. Since there are no other members at the joint, the full unlocking moment of 400 is distributed to AB at A and onehalf of this is carried over to B. The unbalance at B now is 400 480 plus the carry-over of 200 from A, or a total of 120. Hence, a moment of 120 must be applied and distributed to the members at B by multiplying by the distribution factors in the corresponding boxes. The net moment at B could be found now by adding the entries for each member at the joint. However, it generally is more convenient to delay the summation until the last cycle of distribution has been completed. The moment distributed to BA need not be carried over to A, because the carryover factor toward the hinged end is zero. However, half the moment distributed to BC is carried over to C. Similarly, joint C is unlocked and half the distributed moments carried over to B and D, respectively. Joint D should not be unlocked, since it actually is a fixed end. Thus, the first cycle of moment distribution has been completed. The second cycle is carried out in the same manner. Joint B is released, and the distributed moment in BC is carried over to C. Finally, C is unlocked, to complete the cycle. Adding the entries for the end of each member yields the final moments. 5.11.7 Maximum Moments in Continuous Frames In design of continuous frames, one objective is to find the maximum end moments and interior moments produced by the worst combination of loading. For maximum moment at the end of a beam, live load should be placed on that beam and on the FIGURE 5.76 Bending moments in a continuous frame obtained by moment distribution. beam adjoining the end for which the moment is to be computed. Spans adjoining these two should be assumed to be carrying only dead load. For maximum midspan moments, the beam under consideration should be fully loaded, but adjoining spans should be assumed to be carrying only dead load. The work involved in distributing moments due to dead and live loads in continuous frames in buildings can be greatly simplified by isolating each floor. The tops of the upper columns and the bottoms of the lower columns can be assumed fixed. Furthermore, the computations can be condensed considerably by following the procedure recommended in Continuity in Concrete Building Frames. EB033D, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL 60077, and indicated in Fig. Figure 5.74 presents the complete calculation for maximum end and midspan moments in four floor beams AB, BC, CD, and DE. Building columns are assumed to be fixed at the story above and below. None of the beam or column sections is known to begin with; so as a start, all members will be assumed to have a fixedend stiffness of unity, as indicated on the first line of the calculation. On the second line, the distribution factors for each end of the beams are shown, calculated from the stiffnesses (Arts. 5.11.3 and 5.11.4). Column stiffnesses are not shown, because column moments will not be computed until moment distribution to the beams has been completed. Then the sum of the column moments at each joint may be easily computed, since they are the moments needed to make the sum of the end moments at the joint equal to zero. The sum of the column moments at each joint can then be distributed to each column there in proportion to its stiffness. In this example, each column will get one-half the sum of the column moments. Fixed-end moments at each beam end for dead load are shown on the third line, just above the heavy line, and fixed-end moments for live plus dead load on the fourth line. Corresponding midspan moments for the fixed-end condition also are shown on the fourth line and, like the end moments, will be corrected to yield actual midspan moments. For maximum end moment at A, beam AB must be fully loaded, but BC should carry dead load only. Holding A fixed, we first unlock joint B, which has a totalload fixed-end moment of 172 in BA and a dead-load fixed-end moment of 37 in BC. The releasing moment required, therefore, is (172 37), or 135. When B is released, a moment of 135 1/4 is distributed to BA One-half of this is carried over to A, or 135 1/4 1/2 17. This value is entered as the carryover at A on the fifth line in Fig. 5.76. Joint B is then relocked. At A, for which we are computing the maximum moment, we have a total-load fixed-end moment of 172 and a carry-over of 17, making the total 189, shown on the sixth line. To release A, a moment of 189 must be applied to the joint. Of this, 189 1/3, or 63, is distributed to AB, as indicated on the seventh line of the calculation. Finally, the maximum moment at A is found by adding lines 6 and 7: For maximum moment at B, both AB and BC must be fully loaded but CD should carry only dead load. We begin the determination of the moment at B by first releasing joints A and C, for which the corresponding carry-over moments at BA and BC are 29 and (78 70) 1/4 1/2 1, shown on the fifth line in Fig. 5.76. These bring the total fixed-end moments in BA and BC to 201 and 79, respectively. The releasing moment required is (201 79) 122. Multiplying this by the distribution factors for BA and BC when joint B is released, we find the distributed moments, 30, entered on line 7. The maximum end moments finally are obtained by adding lines 6 and 7: 171 at BA and 109 at BC. Maximum moments at C, D, and E are computed and entered in Fig. 5.76 in a similar manner. This procedure is equivalent to two cycles of moment distribution. The computation of maximum midspan moments in Fig. 5.76 is based on the assumption that in each beam the midspan moment is the sum of the simple-beam midspan moment and one-half the algebraic difference of the final end moments (the span carries full load but adjacent spans only dead load). Instead of starting with the simple-beam moment, however, we begin with the midspan moment for the fixed-end condition and apply two corrections. In each span, these corrections are equal to the carry-over moments entered on line 5 for the two ends of the beam multiplied by a factor. For beams with variable moment of inertia, the factor is 1/2[(1/CF ) D 1] where CF is the fixed-end-carry-over factor toward the end for which the correction factor is being computed and D is the distribution factor for that end. The plus sign is used for correcting the carry-over at the right end of a beam, and the minus sign for the carry-over at the left end. For prismatic beams, the correction factor becomes For example, to find the corrections to the midspan moment in AB, we first multiply the carry-over at A on line 5, 17, by 1/2(1 1/3). The correction, 11, is also entered on the fifth line. Then, we multiply the carry-over at B, 29, by 1/2(1 1/4) and enter the correction, 18, on line 6. The final midspan moment is the sum of lines 4, 5, and 6: 99 11 18 128. Other midspan moments in Fig. 5.74 are obtained in a similar manner. See also Arts. 5.11.9 and 5.11.10. 5.11.8 Moment-Influence Factors In certain types of framing, particularly those in which different types of loading conditions must be investigated, it may be convenient to find maximum end moments from a table of moment-influence factors. This table is made up by listing for the end of each member in the structure the moment induced in that end when a moment (for convenience, 1000) is applied to every joint successively. Once this table has been prepared, no additional moment distribution is necessary for computing the end moments due to any loading condition. For a specific loading pattern, the moment at any beam end MAB may be obtained from the moment-influence table by multiplying the entries under AB for the various TABLE 5.6 Moment-Influence Factors
Brick and clay tile can be used as a plaster base if they are not smooth-surfaced or of a nonporous type. If the surface does not provide sufficient suction, it should offer a means for developing a mechanical bond, such as does scored tile. FIGURE 11.22 Application of a base coat of plaster to gypsum lath. (Gold Bond Building Products, a National Gypsum Division.) Plaster should not be applied directly to exterior masonry walls because dampness may damage the plaster. It is advisable to fur the plaster at least 1 in in from the masonry. Properly aged concrete block may serve in walls as a plaster base, but for block ceilings, a bonding agent or a special bonding plaster should be applied first. For precast or cast-in-place concrete with smooth dense surfaces, a bonding agent or a special bonding plaster should be used first. But if a plaster thickness of more than 3/8 in is required for concrete ceilings, or 5/8 in for concrete walls, metal lath should be secured to the concrete before plastering, in which case sanded plaster can be used. 11.25.8 Plaster Base Coats The base coat is the portion of the plaster finish that is applied to masonry or lath bases and supports the finish coat (Fig. 11.22). Except for veneer plasters, plaster applications may be three-coat (Fig. 11.21) or two-coat (Fig. 11.20). The former consists of (1) a scratch coat, which is applied directly to the plaster base, cross-raked after it has taken up, and allowed to set and partly dry; (2) a brown coat, which is surfaced out to the proper grounds, darbied (float-finished), and allowed to set and partly dry; and (3) the finish coat. Three-coat plaster is required over metal lath, 1/2-in gypsum lath spanning horizontal supports more than 16 in c to c, all gypsum lath attached by clips providing only edge support, and 3/8-in perforated gypsum lath on ceilings. The two-coat application is similar, except that cross-raking of the scratch coat is omitted and the brown coat is applied within a few minutes to the unset scratch coat. Three coats are generally preferred, because the base coat thus produced is stronger and harder. Veneer plaster applications, 1/16 in thick, may be one-coat or two-coat, both applied to special gypsum base (Arts. 11.25.1 and 11.25.5). The single coat is composed of a scratch coat without cross-raking and a double-up coat immediately applied, then worked to a smooth or textured finish. See also Art. 11.25.9 and Manual of Gypsum Lathing and Plastering, Gypsum
Website built by Justin O’Dea www.webdeveloperdocklands.com.au